The CEO of Substack Emailed Me at 3AM… (and I Thought I Was in Trouble)
I opened the email expecting a ban. Instead I got an apology from Chris Best (“This sucks. I’m sorry.”). Here's what really happened and why every writer should pay attention now
This morning I woke up, checked my email, and saw something that made my stomach drop.
An email from Chris Best. The CEO of Substack.
My first thought?
Oh no. What did I do?
And the timing made it worse.
Just yesterday I spoke with a former lawyer 🎈Noemi from ME TIME 🎈 about Substack’s community rules. What you can say. What you can’t say. What gets people banned.
So when the CEO emails you right after that talk… your brain goes wild.
Did someone report me?
Did I break a rule?
Is my account gone?
Join today and get two powerful Substack trainings for the price of one. Build faster. Grow smarter.
You hear stories. Writers wake up and their platform disappears. Years of work gone in one click.
So I opened the email with full drama mode activated.
And then… surprise.
I wasn’t in trouble or banned.
I did nothing wrong!
Chris Best was apologizing.
Substack’s CEO apologized to me
Yes. The CEO of Substack (the man in the middle) wrote to apologize.
He even said,
“This sucks. I’m sorry.”
Get inside Substack School and the Club for only 79. One spot left at this price.
You don’t hear that from CEOs very often.
So what happened?
There was a security issue. An unauthorized third party accessed some user data.
Good news:
Not passwords.
Not credit cards.
Not financial info.
But email addresses and phone numbers.
Mine included!
When I read that, I felt two things at once.
Relief. This had nothing to do with me breaking rules.
And concern. Because email and phone data can be used for phishing and scams.
So let me translate this email for you.
This is your place. Learn how to write emails your audience opens, reads, and loves.
What does Chris Best’s email mean and why should I care?
When they say “unauthorized access” it means someone got into a system who should not have.
When they say “limited user data” it means not everything was exposed, but some personal info was.
When they say “we have no evidence of misuse” it means they don’t see attacks yet. But we should still stay alert.
From a legal view, companies must inform users fast when data is exposed. From a security view, trust is everything.
Platforms like Substack, KIT, Beehive, MailChimp and others hold our email lists, our income, our work. So transparency matters.
And honestly? I was glad they told us.
They owned it. They apologized. They explained it.
If you want the latest strategies, growth tips, and platform updates, join us now before the doors close.
What I replied to Chris Best and why we all need to be careful now
Say I’m stupid, but I even replied and said I still love this platform.
But we all need to be careful now:
If you get emails that look like Substack but feel strange… double check them.
If your phone rings and someone claims to be support or acting in the name of Substack or so… be cautious.
This is the moment to stay sharp.
Now I want to hear from you!
Did you also get this email from Substack? Or was it just me?
Have you ever received an email from a platform that made your heart stop for a second?
Tell me in the comments. I read every one.
And if you want to grow on Substack, write better emails, and stay ahead of everything happening on the platform… I have something for you.










I received the same email from the CEO. I told him I appreciates his "honesty and candor." BUT, I want to know who STOLE my private information? Access = STOLEN!! I also want to know what they are doing specifically to prevent this from happening again.
You are the 2nd person today to share this information on my feed and I appreciate it
Re stacked again 🙏❤️🇨🇦