4 Comments
User's avatar
โญ  Return to thread
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 7
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
๐ŸŽˆNoemi Apetri ๐ŸŽˆ's avatar

Yes itโ€™s a real problem! And the solutions are very limited from the purely legal side! But this experienced lawyer has some tricks in my back-pocket. See the suggestions I made in the article.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 7
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
๐ŸŽˆNoemi Apetri ๐ŸŽˆ's avatar

Theoretically the parties can both act unreasonably as you have presented! But that scenario is really unlikely! This is where looking at the full business dynamics really helps. Stipe is not happy to penalise its own customers! They donโ€™t want to lose business!

And on the Subscriber side? Also there itโ€™s a really unlikely scenario! They claim fraud once -> then the subscription ends. They canโ€™t cause trouble to the same person twice (unless they have multiple publications)

A Subscriber doesnโ€™t stand to gain any money from filing multiple claimsโ€ฆ they stand to lose precious time getting involved with this โ€ฆ for little gain except access to premium content. And such an account would be immediately flagged with Substack.

Expand full comment
ErrorError