Yes itโs a real problem! And the solutions are very limited from the purely legal side! But this experienced lawyer has some tricks in my back-pocket. See the suggestions I made in the article.
Theoretically the parties can both act unreasonably as you have presented! But that scenario is really unlikely! This is where looking at the full business dynamics really helps. Stipe is not happy to penalise its own customers! They donโt want to lose business!
And on the Subscriber side? Also there itโs a really unlikely scenario! They claim fraud once -> then the subscription ends. They canโt cause trouble to the same person twice (unless they have multiple publications)
A Subscriber doesnโt stand to gain any money from filing multiple claimsโฆ they stand to lose precious time getting involved with this โฆ for little gain except access to premium content. And such an account would be immediately flagged with Substack.
Yes itโs a real problem! And the solutions are very limited from the purely legal side! But this experienced lawyer has some tricks in my back-pocket. See the suggestions I made in the article.
Theoretically the parties can both act unreasonably as you have presented! But that scenario is really unlikely! This is where looking at the full business dynamics really helps. Stipe is not happy to penalise its own customers! They donโt want to lose business!
And on the Subscriber side? Also there itโs a really unlikely scenario! They claim fraud once -> then the subscription ends. They canโt cause trouble to the same person twice (unless they have multiple publications)
A Subscriber doesnโt stand to gain any money from filing multiple claimsโฆ they stand to lose precious time getting involved with this โฆ for little gain except access to premium content. And such an account would be immediately flagged with Substack.